We are not asking for favors. We are demanding accountability from a public agency that continues to extract money from residents while failing to provide consistent enforcement, meaningful responses, or a defensible explanation for its own contradictory record. These demands arise from a documented pattern of selective enforcement, contradictory citation records, non-response, and the continued exercise of public power without meaningful accountability.
Demand 1
A full refund of citations #958806986, #959050618, and #959520982—totaling $78.00—paid by Cianni A. under protest after repeated enforcement was directed at her vehicle while other visible violations on the block went unaddressed.
Demand 2
Formal dismissal of citation #960486165, issued March 26, 2026, on the grounds that the recorded observation time is directly contradicted by Ring camera footage.
Demand 3
A substantive written response—not a form denial—addressing the repeated and disproportionate enforcement directed at Cianni A.’s vehicle, the contradictory observation times recorded on multiple citations, the dismissals issued without notice, and the agency's continuing failure to provide meaningful answers despite repeated letters, contact-form submissions, and mailed complaint materials since March 2026.
Demand 4
A formal disciplinary review of the officer operating PPA Vehicle #581 on March 12, 2026, including review of the decision to cite Cianni A. while bypassing other visible violations and while the PPA vehicle itself was photographed blocking a private driveway.
Demand 5
A formal review of the residential permit parking zone and enforcement practices on this block, including an explanation of why daily posted restrictions and permit requirements remain in place while observed PPA enforcement continues on an intermittent, every-other-week basis rather than in any manner consistent with the daily restrictions posted throughout the block.
Demand 6
Formal dismissal of the April 15, 2026 citation issued after Cianni A.’s annual parking permit became effective, where the recorded observation time was directly contradicted by preserved Ring camera footage.
Demand 7
A written explanation of the agency's refund position, including why refund-related relief was previously denied for earlier paid citations while later written agency correspondence stated that a canceled citation may support a written refund request in the event of overpayment.